Skip to main content

Volume 76 (2021), 4

Original Articles

(Original title: Na obranu vágnosti)
Filozofia, 76 (2021), 4, 237 – 251.
Abstract

Philosophers often consider vagueness (a linguistic expressions admits of unclear or borderline cases of application) to be an undesirable phenomenon. The authors of the text reject the exi stence of ontological vagueness, and, in cooperation with T. Williamson, they find the roots of vagueness in insufficient understanding. Apart from epistemological vagueness,… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Problém života čistého Já v Husserlových L-manuskriptech)
Filozofia, 76 (2021), 4, 252 – 266.
Abstract

In his Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Edmund Husserl introduces the pure ‘I’ (reines Ich) as a peculiar, non-constituted transcendence that is not contained in the stream of immanent experience. In the Ideas, however, Husserl does not elaborate much on the consequences of this step regarding the internal time-… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Jankélévitch a Ricœur o povinnosti pamäti)
Filozofia, 76 (2021), 4, 267 – 280.
Abstract

This article deals with a specific dimension of collective memory – the duty of memory. It focuses on two philosophical approaches concerning the question of the duty of memory, as represented, on the one hand, by occasional texts of V. Jankélévitch published in the works Imprescriptible (1986), or in Lʼesprit de résistance (2015), and, on the other hand, the… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Philosophical Problems and Therapy. Polemic with The New Wittgenstein)
Filozofia, 76 (2021), 4, 281 – 292.
Abstract

The paper argues against the interpretations of Wittgenstein’s philosophy by Conant, Diamond, and Crary presented in The New Wittgenstein. Such interpretations are based on the concept of mere (or plain) nonsense and try out a strategy of translating Wittgenstein’s work into the idiom of therapeutic philosophy. In my argumentation, I show that it is impossible to… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Eco a Vattimo – negatívny realizmus verzus slabé myslenie)
Filozofia, 76 (2021), 4, 293 – 306.
Abstract

The paper intends to introduce main points of Eco’s critique of Vattimo’s philosophy. It focuses on differences in their approaches and provides a closer view of one of the philosophical discussions happening at the wake of the new millennium. We focus on understanding reality and the limits of interpretation as the two key points of Eco’s consideration and… Read more

File to download: PDF