Skip to main content

Volume 74 (2019), 9

---

(Original title: Na úvod: Argumenty a argumentácia)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 689.

Articles

(Original title: Druhy nezhody a ich (semi)formálna rekonštrukcia)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 690-704.
Abstract

The phenomenon of doxastic (epistemic) disagreement pertains to contemporary discussions in epistemology. Moreover, a related notion of the difference of opinion (or standpoints) is at the centre of the theory of argumentation (cf. van Eemeren et al. 2014). In this paper, we propose a broader definition of argument which seems to serve a fruitful theoretical… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Abstrakcia, idealizácia a používanie argumentov)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 705-720.
Abstract

The methods of abstraction and idealization are typically examined in connection with their applications in modelling and explanation. This paper investigates how the use of abstract and idealized models in arguments structures the process of argumentation. If a discussant uses an idealized model to justify a thesis, they also adopt an implicit or explicit… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Millova mylná výhrada petitio principii voči deduktívnej logike)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 721-734.
Abstract

The critique of logic, as it was taught on the British Isles, intensified at the beginning of the 19th century. A systematic critique of Aristotelian (syllogistic) logic was undertaken from the standpoint of common sense philosophy chiefly by Scottish philosophers, followers of T. Reid. E. Copleston of Oxford came to logic’s defense. His student, R. Whately, later… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Sľuby a procedúry)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 735-753.
Abstract

The work tends to point out the deficiency of some opinions claiming simplified presentation of the promise as the act that directly rise obligation for the promisor. Promises, either in the moral or legal sphere, are based on communication and so form an order of dependent steps that indicates their procedural nature. These characteristics may differ to a lesser… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Subjektívny vkus a argumentácia)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 754-767.
Abstract

Argumentation is usually used to achieve a state in which one participant of a dialogue brings another participant to accept a belief the former presents. This idea is acceptable when it comes to disputes about (objective) facts. In the case of disputes about subjective tastes, however, the participants usually achieve a different kind of result; it often happens… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Je nedorozumenie medzi kompatibilistami a inkompatibilistami len verbálne?)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 768-784.
Abstract

The goal of this paper is to show that disagreement between compatibilists and incompatibilists about compatibility of free will with determinism is merely verbal, since although one side of the dispute claims that free will is compatible with determinism, whereas the other side denies it, they in fact ascribe to the expression „free will“ a different meaning. One… Read more

File to download: PDF

Reviews

(Original title: HALAS, Juraj: Abstrakcia a idealizácia)
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 785-789.
File to download: PDF
(Original title: CHAVALKA, Jakub, SIKORA, Ondřej: Nietzsche o ctnosti (2. mimořádné číslo Filosofického časopisu 2/2018))
Filozofia, 74 (2019), 9, 790-794.
File to download: PDF