Volume 65 (2010), 2

V celej Heideggerovej tvorbe predstavuje recepcia dejín filozofie dominantný rozmer jeho filozofického učenia. Autor štúdie sa zamýšľa nad problémom, či Heidegger mohol úspešne zavŕšiť dokončenie svojho diela Bytie a čas ako ho pôvodne ohlásil pri prvom vydaní . Zisťuje, že nenaplnenie pôvodných zámerov k druhej nenapísanej časti práce nebolo vôbec náhodným… Čítať ďalej

The paper gives an analysis of the Neo-Kantian philosophy of the 1920s and 1930s, which for Hartmann and Heidegger was a shared philosophical platform. Both philosophers are to be conceived of mainly in the context of Neo-Kantianism, which ends, when the conception of epistemology as prima philosophia is replaced by ontology. While Hartmann conceived of… Čítať ďalej

The aim of the paper is to show the role and meaning of Descartes’s philosophy in the context of Heidegger’s way of philosophizing, focusing on his metaphysics of subjectivity. According to Heidegger the latter is marked by a transformation in understanding the being of existence. By this he meant the fact, that the in representation of being is determined by the… Čítať ďalej

The paper offers an examination of Patočka’s attempt to clear a difficulty of Husserl´s transcendental phenomenology and to develop a non-subjective conception of phenomenology. The author gives a thorough analysis of two fundamental wri- tings, compiled by Patočka in German in 1970 – 1971. The aim of the paper is to follow Patočka´s way of gradually developing… Čítať ďalej

In J. Patočka’s writings of the 1970s the concept of Europe plays an important role. For him Europe was closely related to the Greek idea of taking care of the soul and thus to the very origins of history. In the course of history, which began in ancient Greece and whose end is marked by the World War 1st, however, this idea has lost its strength. Europe in its… Čítať ďalej

The medieval Christian philosophy was influenced by the translations of the writings of the ancient philosophers from Arabic into Latin. Among them was also Liber de causis. In his commentary to this book Albert the Great examines Avicebron’s theory of universal matter and universal form, offering his own interpretation of the latter. The conclusions of the author… Čítať ďalej