Ročník 74 (2019), 6

Eugen Fink and Martin Heidegger met in 1966 to read Heraclitus. The differences between their conceptions led to significant differences in their commentaries. Fink considered the term of “fire” as the fundamental term in Heraclitus՚ philosophy because it reminded him of his concept of “the world”, while Heidegger focused on the concept of logos and saw in… Čítať ďalej

This article investigates Heidegger՚s and Hegel՚s understanding of Being. The main focus is on Heidegger՚s late work and on his thinking conversation with Hegel. However, in Hegel՚s understanding of metaphysics there is a significant absence of the notion of being as such in its unity with the highest being, but also a desire to identify Being itself as opposed to… Čítať ďalej

Globalization and mass migration have raised anew the question of the nature and origin of human rights. There have been a number of works that seek inspiration on this issue from the philosophy of Hegel. Usually, the primary focus of these works has, naturally enough, been the main statement of Hegel’s political philosophy, the Philosophy of Right. Scholars go to… Čítať ďalej

The paper deals with the analyses of the third paradox from the Cicero's work Stoic Paradoxes (Cic. Parad. 20 – 26). This paradox is trying to defend the controversial stoic claim, that sins and virtues are alike (Aequalia esse peccata et recte facta). In the paper the author tries to present two interpretative solutions to the question of determining the sources… Čítať ďalej

This paper is a response to a polemical study by A. Novák, who, based on the recently published volumes of Heidegger՚s posthumous work (GA, Vol. 82, 94), presents Heidegger as a critic of phenomenology and of himself. At the same time, Heidegger denied the existence of phenomenology as a doctrine and also distanced himself from the book Being and Time in order to… Čítať ďalej