Skočiť na hlavný obsah

Ročník 77 (2022), 4

Na úvod

Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 231 - 232.
Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF

State

Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 233 - 250.
Abstrakt

The author analyzes the difference between a concept and its different conceptions by using the example of the difference between the concept and conceptions of justice in analytic philosophy in the context of constitutional interpretation. The difference between the concept and distinct conceptions of the concept appears within a section of constitutional… Čítať ďalej

Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF
Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 251 - 267.
Abstrakt

The offensive of neoliberal theory and practice has clearly weakened since the structural crisis of Western capitalism. Neoliberal dogma has nothing to offer a precarized society, science, education, politics and above all a mundane civi-lization threatened by environmental risks. This will be the task of an environmental policy that uses the insights of political… Čítať ďalej

Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF
Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 268 - 282.
Abstrakt

Ideologically different alternative media define themselves in opposition to mainstream journalism, and attacks on the perceived lack of objectivity of its authors are especially common for them. This paper examines their role in the context of Habermasian concept of the public sphere and distinguishes between alternative media as institutions of the counterpublic… Čítať ďalej

Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF
Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 283 - 297.
Abstrakt

The objective of this article is to answer the question: On what basis, or under what conditions can moral responsibility be attributed to a collective? The author assumes that the moral world is not only populated by individuals, but it also includes groups. The goal of the paper is to show that raising the question of collective responsibility in its moral… Čítať ďalej

Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF

Úvahy - eseje

Filozofia, 77 (2022), 4, 298 - 305.
Abstrakt

The article presents a paradox and a dilemma associated with democracy. The paradox regards the issue of rule in an informationally transparent democracy: whereas transparency may lead to the exploitation of democracy by hostile agents, restricting transparency may lead to the transformation of a democracy into an autocracy. Within the terms of this paradox, I… Čítať ďalej

Súbor na stiahnutie: PDF

Knižné recenzie